Hi @sunithajohn
There must be something missing as you can read above with all other people getting same negative result.
I cannot really guess the reason with the limited information that you have shared for your case.
Hi @sunithajohn
There must be something missing as you can read above with all other people getting same negative result.
I cannot really guess the reason with the limited information that you have shared for your case.
Dear Anil,
Please find below details received from ACS.
Thank you for your ICT skills assessment, which was received by the Australian Computer Society on 31
December 2019.
Your skills have been assessed to be unsuitable for migraļæ½on under ANZSCO Code 262113 (Systems
Administrator).
You have been assessed as not meeļæ½ng the requirements for professional informaļæ½on technology
experience of four (4) years in a field closely related to your nominated skilled occupaļæ½on.
Your qualificaļæ½on has been assessed as follows:
Your Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Bharathiar University completed May 2001 has
been assessed as comparable to an AQF Bachelor Degree with a Major in compuļæ½ng.
Your work experience has been calculated as follows on the basis of full ļæ½me employment of at least 20hrs
per week:
Dates: 11/05 - 10/07 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Posiļæ½on: System Administrator - Not Assessable Due to Insufficient Documentaļæ½on
Employer: Reliance Innomedia Technologies
Country: Outside Of Australia
Dates: 12/07 - 12/08 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Posiļæ½on: Systems Administrator - Not Assessable Due to Insufficient Documentaļæ½on
Employer: Consilium Middle East FZC
Country: Outside Of Australia
Dates: 02/09 - 12/19 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Posiļæ½on: Systems Administrator - Not Assessable Due to Insufficient Documentaļæ½on
Employer: Orion Engineering Consultants
Country: Outside Of Australia
It seems the āroles and responsibilitiesā letter had insufficient information.
Thank you so much Anilā¦
Hi
My ACS result is negative as follows:
Your skills have been assessed to be unsuitable for migration under ANZSCO Code 261313 (Software Engineer).
You have been assessed as not meeting the requirements for professional information technology experience of four (4) years in a ļ¬eld closely related to your nominated skilled occupation.
Your qualiļ¬cation has been assessed as follows:
Your Bachelor of Technology in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Uttar Pradesh Technical University completed August 2009 has been assessed as comparable to an AQF Bachelor Degree with a Major in computing.
Your work experience has been calculated as follows on the basis of full time employment of at least 20hrs per week:
Dates: 06/10 - 03/13 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Position: Quality Analyst and Software Engineer - Not Assessable Due to Insuļ¬cient Documentation
Employer: -----------
Country: Outside Of Australia
Dates: 04/13 - 01/16 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Position: Quality Analyst and Software Engineer - Not Assessable Due to Insuļ¬cient Documentation
Employer: -----------
Country: Outside Of Australia
Dates: 02/16 - 11/19 - 3 year(s) 10 month(s)
Position: Professional One Product Test and Software Engineer Employer: ----------
Country: Outside Of Australia
My 4 years with last employer was completed on Feb 2020. Shall I apply for reassessment now or I should review my assessment for reason of rejection of first two companies due to insufficient documentation.
I only need positive skill assessment as I am secondary applicant. Pl guide.
My suggestion is to review the reasons of negative assessment and then reapply for assessment.
Hi,
I have received result letter saying unsuitable for migraton under ANZSCO Code 261313 (Software Engineer) due to insfufficient documentation for professional information technology experience of two (2) years in a field closely related to my nominated skilled occupation.
Below are the details of documents uploaded.
Previous employer
Dates: 02/11 - 05/19 - 08 year(s) 3 month(s)
Position: Senior Associate
Country: Outside Of Australia
Documents uploaded :
Current employer:
Dates: 05/19 - till date - 0 year(s) 9 month(s)
Employer: Tata Consultancy Services
Country: Outside Of Australia
Documents uploaded :
I wrote mail to ACS for clarification, below is the response from thier end
For employment at Cognizant:
a) Applicant has attached payslips of only 3 months of 2019 to claim an employment of 8 years. The evidence should cover starting and end of each year of employment.
b) The second payment evidence attached is an ITR-V form from India, which is not valid since it does not have the name of the employer. Documents MUST cite the applicants and employers name.
For employment at TCS:
a) Applicant has attached only one category of pay evidence (payslips) as against minimum 2 categories required.
b) Deponentās service letter/relieving letter confirming the dates served in the company are missing.
c) The statutory declaration attached is not valid as it does not contain the words āSworn Before, Signed Before or Witnessed Beforeā the notary/authorized witness.
I have some queries related to upload documents to go for review, kindy let me know what are the documents should i be uploading to get positive outcome.
For employment at Cognizant:
1. I can get only last 6 months of payslips
2. I can get only last 3 years of Form 16
3. Provident fund deduction - can i upload passbook from epfindia?
4. Bank statement- should i be upload salary credit transaction for all the years (8)?
For employment at TCS (current):
Please read above discussion and then the complete list of financial documents that can be used for ACS assessment.
Thank you @Anil.Gupta, I have read the dicsussions and the complete list of financial documents that can be used for ACS assessment but below are the my specific questions related to financial documents, please let me know how to proceed with right documents?
For employment at Cognizant: 02/11 - 05/19 - 08 year(s) 3 month(s)
For employment at TCS (current):
If you read the article carefully, it clearly says that financial document from start of each and end of year is enough to prove each year of employment.
Now, it is up-to you what all documents you have and what not.
ACS does not need every monthās financial document.
Hi @Anil.Gupta
Recently i have been rejected with the ACS for my 10 years experience due to insufficient payment evidence. I have provided them following:
I do have FORM 16 but on that the company owner name has been mentioned as tax deductor because he is the sole proprietor of the company. Kindly suggest me how should i proceed further on with review ?
I will be very thankful to you.
The company name needs to be shown on all financial documents. If not, then you should get a letter on letter head from employer clearly stating the name they use for financial transactions.
Hello @Anil.Gupta
Thanks for the reply. I have got following response when i contacted them back
Dear Baljinder,
Thanks for your email.
Please note that the ACS are under no obligation to request additional documentation as applicants are advised to ensure they have read the [Skills Assessment Guidelines for Applicants](file:///C:/Users/Renju.Skills/Downloads/SkillsAssessmentGuidelinesforApplicants%20(2).pdf) and that their application is decision ready before applying ā
Your application must be decision ready before you submit an online application which means all your education and employment documentation must meet the ACS requirements to gain a suitable assessment.
All the documentation must meet our requirements as per the [Skill Assessment Guidelines for Applicants](file:///C:/Users/Renju.Skills/Downloads/SkillsAssessmentGuidelinesforApplicants%20(2).pdf) otherwise cannot be assessed even if you had a previous suitable assessment
Please note that there are no other alternatives other than what is stipulated in the guidelines.
Your employment experience at āIdea Foundationā was not assessable due to following reasons noted by the assessor:
a) Assessor had some concerns over the payslips provided, the signature is exactly the same, positioned in the same spot across them all despite the date of when the payslip was produced, therefore not acceptable
b) Moreover many salary slip amounts and dates do not match with the bank statement provided.
c) The bank statements do not identify the employer and the salary slips do not identify the bank account number to cross-verify.
3rd part form 26AS for all years and/or government issued EPF statement for all years must be provided
Please refer [Skill Assessment Guidelines for Applicants](file:///C:/Users/Renju.Skills/Downloads/SkillsAssessmentGuidelinesforApplicants%20(2).pdf)
If you would like to have additional documentation assessed, you can lodge a Review application within 60 days of your result letter. Please refer to the ACS Review and Appeal Information for further information.
Why didnāt the company deduct taxes earlier?
You can get an affidavit from company to show the bank account number.
it is a very small company with only 15 employees. They always said that they are not liable to deduct tax because government rule if more than 20 employees. We also did not ever asked because we did not realize how important it is.
Hi @Anil.Gupta
A similar situation happened to me and have received the below response from ACS
Can you help
. I received below negative response from ACS and I fail to understand the reason as I had submitted colored copies of my degree and mark sheets.
Also for professional experience, I had submitted, notarized affidavit, company letter stating non-issuance of roles and responsibilities letter, Bank statement, IT returns, payslips
Waiting for your valuable feedback on how to steer this forward
Thanks in anticipation
<<<<
Thank you for your ICT skills assessment, which was received by the Australian Computer Society on 24 June
2020.
Your ICT skills have been assessed as unsuitable for migration under ANZSCO Code 261312 (Developer
Programmer).
The following qualification does not meet the ACS suitability criteria:
Your Bachelor of Engineering from Maharishi Dayanand University completed May 2010 could not
be assessed due to lack of information /documentation and therefore it does not meet the
requirements of the ACS as stated in the policy manual.
Your work experience has been calculated as follows on the basis of full time employment of at least 20hrs
per week:
Dates: 03/11 - 06/20 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Position: Technical Lead - Not Assessable Due to Insufficient Documentation
Your work experience has been calculated as follows on the basis of full me employment of at least 20hrs
per week:
Dates: 03/11 - 06/20 - 0 year(s) 0 month(s)
Position: Technical Lead - Not Assessable Due to Insufficient Documentation
Employer: Country: Outside Of Australia
This is legit document and company name will be verified upon verifying the ITR-V. I do no undertand why ACS thinks it is not valid document.
When we file ITR, employer name and their TIN no is mentioned and on ITR-V there would be barcode to validate the it.
Experts, please give your opinion on it.
One more thing I would like to ask, if ACS is not considering the ITR-V then ACS will not consider EPFO statement as it also doesnāt have Employer name.
Experts, please give your opinion on this too.